Dr. Bateman, in a presidential address at a meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Science at Toronto some years ago, reviewed the unpleasant (to him) fact that evolution was far from proved and that many ideas scientists had taken for granted in connection with the evolutionary hypothesis were now proved untenable. But he still said that evolution must be true because the only alternative to evolution was direct creation of God, which he certainly would not accept. In other words, Dr. Bateman believed in evolution, contrary to the evidence, because he did not want to believe in direct creation! - John R. Rice [Is Jesus God?, pg. 190-191]
A missing link? All the links are missing! There is no link between inanimate matter and living matter, organic and inorganic. We have no link between plants and animals. We have no link between conscious life and unconscious. We have no link between man and beast. In fact, we have no link between any two well-defined species in the world.
You see, men do not accept evolution because the facts force them to accept it. They accept it because they want to, in spite of the facts. - John R. Rice [Is Jesus God?, pg. 191-192]
Once modernists said that Moses could not have written the Pentateuch because men could not read and write in Moses' day. Now no educated man who knows of the Tel El Amarna tablets and other modern discoveries can doubt that men of Moses' day wrote. On a thousand fronts modernists have been driven back as clay tablets and stone inscriptions and the uncovered ruins of ancient cities have proved the modernists wrong. There was a nation of Hittites, though the modernists long said there was none. Cyrenius was governor of Syria briefly, as Luke 2:2 declares--as historians now know, but once denied. Not one archaeological discovery, not one ancient manuscript, not one scientific development has disproved a single statement of the Word of God. Yet modernists go blithely and determinedly on their way opposing it. - John R. Rice [Is Jesus God?, pg. 193]
Why do modernists still not believe the Bible? Because they do not want to believe it! If the Bible were true, then men ought to follow it. If the Ten Commandments be God's laws, then murder, adultery, lying and covetousness will be punished and sinful men will be held accountable for their sins. If there be a Hell for God-rejecting sinners, then these men who hate Christ are in danger of eternal damnation, and they do not like such a doctrine. If Christ be the virgin-born Son of God, then they ought to love Him and trust Him and serve and obey Him. Don't you see how modernists who want to live for today instead of eternity, who want to have their own way instead of God's way, who want to be popular with men instead of righteous before God, hate the Bible? - John R. Rice [Is Jesus God?, pg. 193]
The blindness, the folly of modernists, is the result of their wicked hearts. Unbelief is not a product of the mind, but of the heart. Unbelief does not come from intelligent investigation; it comes from sin in the heart. - John R. Rice [Is Jesus God?, pg. 195]
Modernists do not agree that Jesus is the pre-existent Christ of the Old Testament, the one foretold by the prophets, the Christ of God. Everyone who does not accept Christ as God come in the flesh according to prophecy, is a deceiver and an antichrist, says the Scripture. And Christians are to look to themselves carefully lest they lose their reward for their works and suffer because of compromising with these unbelievers and modernists. One who does not abide in the doctrine of Christ, the Christ of the Bible, does not have God, is not a Christian, is not to be received as a Christian. - John R. Rice [Is Jesus God?, pg. 198]
No comments:
Post a Comment